Skip to content

CONCEPT Cited by 3 sources

Scale-up / scale-out / scale-across

Scale-up, scale-out, and scale-across are the three distance domains of AI cluster networking — a taxonomy that classifies an interconnect by how far apart the things it connects are, because distance dictates bandwidth, latency, and the transport/topology choices available.

Domain Connects Distance Classic tech
Scale-up accelerator ↔ accelerator within a rack / pod NVLink, proprietary buses (now Ethernet via Tahan / ESUN)
Scale-out GPU ↔ GPU across a training cluster / building RoCE / InfiniBand over Clos / multiplane
Scale-across fabric ↔ fabric across buildings / campuses / regions Ethernet super-spine (BAG), SRv6 backbone

Why the taxonomy matters

  • Each domain is bandwidth-vs-distance-bound differently. Scale-up is the highest bandwidth / lowest latency (bytes travel centimeters); scale-across is the lowest bandwidth / highest latency (bytes travel kilometers). A design that works in one domain can break in another — e.g. lossless-Ethernet buffer headroom is trivial in-rack and a first-order problem across km.
  • The industry push is "one transport across all three." Meta's OCP 2026 thesis is that Ethernet + lossless RoCE can serve every domain, unified under one NOS (FBOSS): Tahan (scale-up) reuses the scale-out RoCE transport; FPF (scale-out) and BAG (scale-across) are the other two layers.
  • A single training job now spans all three. A model trains across accelerators in a rack (scale-up), GPUs across a building (scale-out), and buildings across a region (scale-across) — the collective communication must cross all three fabrics, which is why distance-awareness in routing and scheduling matters.

Seen in (wiki)

Last updated · 854 distilled / 2,448 read